v. Kunnath case study solution court has also described Force majeure as a protection to absolve case study answer liabilities and it is to be noted that in all case study answer cases as a result of case study solution instances which was not under case study answer control of humans, and if damages were occurred to case study answer good because of those incidents then it cant be claimed from case study answer insurance policy. The above cases were coping with case study solution coverage companies but even coming to case study solution cases associated with a buyer and a seller or service issuer, Act of God, and Force majeure act as a key point in contract and in case study solution case of Smt. Inacia P. Carvalho v Desk To Desk Courier and Cargo Limited case study answer honorable court has held that even in case study solution event of Force Majeure a respondent cant plea for absolving of his duties and liabilities which he himself voluntarily took by case study answer agreement whose consent was also fulfill and is legal and enforceable and if that has happen then case study solution respondent is prone to compensate case study answer other events of case study answer agreement and that Force Majeure and Act of god doesnt include every instances to cover up case study solution deficiency of their facilities and their negligence. In this example case study solution honorable court also said that it is often believed in good faith that a question of professionalism will always be shown by appearing case study solution duty of agreement and for escaping case study solution liabilities by asking case study answer plea of Force Majeure in any negligent unprofessional action is not acceptable.